Antiwar groups around the
have designated the weekend of Oct.
5-7, the 11th anniversary of the launch of the United States war on U.S. , as a time for public
demonstrations and major educational events. The United National Antiwar
Coalition hosted an Aug. 29 national phone organizing meeting attended by 49
representatives from peace groups wishing to participate in 19 states. The
Veterans for Peace national convention, held in mid-August in Afghanistan , ratified the UNAC call. Florida
UNAC-associated actions for which planning is already underway will take place in
, New York City , Chicago , Minneapolis , and San Francisco . In Los Angeles , the effort is being led by the
Islamic Leadership Council, the Muslim Peace Coalition, Black is Back, and
Desis Rising Up and Moving, all groups especially interested in highlighting
the relationship between the war abroad and increasing repression against
communities of color at home. In New York City , civil liberties are to be the
major theme of a large teach-in at San Francisco . Laney College
Rising violence in
, continued civilian casualties from
drone attacks in Afghanistan , rising expenditures for weapons of
war, and fears of U.S./NATO/Israeli attacks on Pakistan or Iran are motivating activists from one
end of the country to another. Syria
A “Keep Space for Peace Week,” Oct. 6-13, with activities in
, Maine , Massachusetts , New Mexico , Pennsylvania , England , and India , is including demands to End the
Afghanistan War, Stop the Drones, and Say No to NATO expansion. Sweden
Meanwhile, a Code Pink Peace Delegation, organized out of the First International Drone Summit held in April in
, will be making its way to Washington, D.C. to meet with victims of drone
attacks and prepare reports on the humanitarian impact of the unending Pakistan war in the region. Despite the low
level of mobilization that election years bring, and despite the disorientation
that U.S. ’s shift from promoting massive troop deployments to
secretive drone warfare and special operations has wrought, the antiwar
movement will be visible this fall. Washington
In part, this is because
is back in the news, and the
unpopular nature of the Afghanistan occupation has been driven home
once again. On Sept. 1, the Washington Post reported that the U.S. government is reacting to the
recent escalation of “green-on-blue,” or “insider,” attacks on U.S. troops by Afghan trainees by
halting the training of Afghan troops until a new system of background checks
can be implemented. On Sept. 2, The New York Times reported that U.S. troops have been ordered to carry
weapons at all times, including on supposedly secure U.S. bases. U.S.
Political columnist Tom Engelhardt noted that the mainstream media response to this glitch in the official narrative, the scenario in which the United States hands over most fighting duties to Afghan troops by 2014, has been to begin floating the idea that the U.S. just might not really be able to get out anytime soon.
In this they concur with the assessment of former Afghan member of parliament Malalai Joya, who said at the May 13-14 Chicago People’s Summit: “Obama and Karzai claim the war will end in 2014, while on the other hand, they say that U.S. troops will remain in some capacity until 2024. My friends, when 2024 comes closer, they will say they plan to remain in
until 2034. The reality is that the
Afghanistan and their NATO allies plan to dominate U.S. and the larger region militarily
for the next generation...” Afghanistan
As one of the longest running wars in
history, U.S. , and the accompanying drone war in Afghanistan , are well understood by the
movement and will be a focus in the October actions. The level of Pakistan involvement in the rest of the
region needs to be the subject of continuing and broad education if the movement
is to be able to mobilize effective numbers in the street. U.S.
withdrawal of combat troops from U.S. in 2011, antiwar activists have
been debating its meaning. Was the redeployment of Iraq troops to regional bases a historic
turning point regarding the dominance of U.S. imperialism in the U.S. Middle East?
was thwarted in its plans to
maintain huge military bases on Iraqi soil as part of its greater efforts to
retain control over access to strategic energy resources vital to its
international economic competitors, including U.S. . Yet redeployment has not seriously
impeded the suppression of the oil workers, the privatization of Iraqi oil, or
its exploitation by British Petroleum, Exxon, Chevron, Shell, and other China and European companies. According
to Greg Muttitt, author of “What Ever Happened to Iraqi Oil?”, Iraq’s output
now places it in the number-two position in OPEC, a position previously held by
Iran, whose oil exports have been cut in half by U.S.-ordered sanctions. U.S.
government’s momentary preference
for “light-footprint warfare”—raids by special operations forces, drone
assassinations, proxy militias, cyberwarfare, etc.—are the options available to
an imperial power that has no real military competitors in most regions of the
globe. This shift, however, does not correlate to a slowing of military
intervention in terms of geography or dollars. The latest Congressional
Research Service annual arms sales report was widely commented on by the
antiwar community because it documented the fact that in just one year, 2011,
the Obama administration boosted export arms sales by $42 billion. In the
recent period, the U.S. government has facilitated a jump
in arms sales to the developing world from the $9 billion level of the
Bush administration years to $56 billion in 2011. U.S.
A stunning proportion of those sales have gone to
allies in the U.S. Middle East. John Rees of the Stop the Wars
Coalition recently wrote, “Between 1950 and
2006 UK purchased $63 billion worth of
weapons and equipment through the Pentagon’s Foreign Military Sales programme.
In 2010 it announced a similar amount of military purchases—but in just 15
years, not half a century.” Saudi Arabia
Proxy warfare, however, is not the only game plan. The
has been upgrading or building new
bases in U.S. , Kuwait , Bahrain , Oman , and Qatar . In Jordan , 15,000 troops are stationed in Kuwait alone. Camp Arifjan
In addition, the
buildup for war with U.S. is indisputable. Prof. Vijay
Prashad recently described the Iran naval deployment in the U.S. Persian Gulf, a deployment just boosted by the
floating base known as the USS Ponce, as a “traffic jam of American power
in the Persian
Gulf.” The joins USS Enterprise and USS
Lincoln, both first-class warships that are supported by a considerable battle
group, as well as the various marine and amphibious task forces of the U.S.
Fifth Fleet based at the Naval Support Activity station in Ponce . Manama, Bahrain
The softening up of
via sanctions, assassinations, and
covert ops continues with the new sanctions designed to lower Iran ’s ability to export oil below the
current level, which is already only 40% of their previous exports. The BritishGuardian has
reported that the sanctions against the regime were already having a huge impact
on the population, leading to the quadrupling of food prices and dramatic
shortages of medicine, including for hemophiliac children. Iran
is not running from the U.S. Middle East with its tail between its legs. In
short, Washington’s inability to establish a puppet Iraqi regime effective
enough to make massive and permanent basing a reality was a setback but has not
in any way forced the U.S. to contemplate giving up its military and imperial
hegemony in the region.
The reason is that the world capitalist economic crisis is intensifying inter-imperialist rivalry and moving the
capitalist class to undertake a
significant expansion in terms of dollars spent and in terms of the geographic
swath of the planet on which they hope to exert military hegemony. Mass
responses to the economic crisis by events like the Arab Spring and the Greek
general strikes have alerted the big powers to the fact that their current
method of economic rule, be it through despots or social democracy, is not
Thus, not only the
but every major power is striving
to increase its military arsenal. Those who were formerly dependent on the U.S
military to protect their interests now understand that either they develop
their own military capacities or they will be shunted aside in the intensifying
race for resources and profits. The U.S.-led NATO war against United States served as a perfect example, when
the Libya , U.S. , England , and France jockeyed for position regarding
whose military forces would predominate in the destruction of that nation and
which would secure the largest percentage of the oil booty. Italy
The already severe sanctions and covert operations against Iran and Syria and the increasing threats to implement a “no-fly zone” in Syria (which could only begin to be implemented after the massive bombing of strategic air bases with adjacent civilian areas) have but one objective, to re-integrate these nations into the economic and military framework of the great powers and to stymie competition from trade blocs led by China as they relate to energy resources, pipelines, and markets.
The heroic democratic upsurge of the Syrian people to depose Assad has to overcome not only the normal obstacles faced by a people without a well-organized working-class or revolutionary party but also U.S. intervention with arms via the Saudi and Gulf Coast monarchies, CIA operatives on the ground, and U.S.-backed NGOs advising from neighboring countries—all designed to prevent the taking of power by genuinely democratic and anti-imperialist groupings based on the Local Coordinating Councils. And soon, perhaps, the Syrian masses will have to face a Libya-style NATO intervention.
and the Israel are theatrically playing hard cop /
soft cop regarding a military assault on US ’s nuclear facilities. Both
countries are also creating the kind of propaganda that will allow them to
justify an assault on Hezbollah in Iran as a military escalation occurs.
Palestinian activists fear a scenario in which a regional conflagration will
allow Lebanon to take over the entire Israel West Bank once and for all.
The expansion of the U.S. military on the African continent, a continent already wracked by the most destructive interventions—proxy imperialist wars over mineral resources, dramatic land grabs that are destroying subsistence agriculture, and other tools of the new scramble for Africa—now includes a “war on terror” game plan whose operatives are sited in continuous swaths from Algeria to Mali to Nigeria to Uganda and Somalia beyond. Glen Ford recently pointed out that the U.S. has pushed for renewed sanctions on Eritrea, one of only four countries on the African continent that have refused to work directly with the U.S. military command, Africom. By 2013, the
plans to have a new
3000-soldier-strong roving unit of rangers, housed in safe spaces in Africom
friendly nations, available for dramatic strikes anywhere on the continent. U.S.
The so-called military “pivot to
Asia” that is accompanying the efforts of the to challenge Asian centric trading
blocs via the Trans Pacific Partnership and other measures is not mere
propaganda. The new U.S. base on Jeju island is designed to
hold Aegis war ships, 38 of which make up President Obama’s U.S. missile-defense system. Secretary
of Defense Leon Panetta announced in June that by 2020 the greater part of
American naval forces—including six aircraft carrier battle groups as well as a
majority of the navy’s cruisers, destroyers, Littoral Combat ships, and
submarines—would be stationed in the Asian Pacific. U.S.
are not exempted. Washington is
greatly expanding the so-called “drug war “ in the Americas, with U.S. troops
recently killing fisherman in the part of Honduras that is home to the most
radical elements of the ongoing fight for land and sovereignty. Americas
In short, the global crisis guarantees that while the imperialists’ strategy and tactics may change—less counter-insurgency but more counter-terrorism, fewer troops but more drones and special ops, a “Presidential Kill List,” etc.—imperialist wars are not on the wane but on the upswing and will be a permanent feature of the political landscape. The efforts by the United National Antiwar Coalition and many other peace groups to use the Oct. 5, 6, and 7 weekend to educate new activists and regroup the veterans is a modest but important step toward deepening consciousness and sustaining an antiwar infrastructure. To find an organizing effort mounting activity for the 11th anniversary dates, visit http://october7actions.net/wordpress/. See the UNAC site at www.unacpeace.org.
> The article above was written by Christine Marie, and is reprinted from Socialist Action newspaper.